Why do the different constituencies of the president

Electoral divisions (also called constituencies) are areas within Singapore demarcated by the Prime Minister by law for the purposes of Parliamentary elections and Presidential elections.

Each electoral division is sub-divided into many smaller areas known as polling districts and each polling district will have its own polling station.

A register of electors is prepared for each electoral division.

There are 2 types of electoral divisions in Singapore:

• Single Member Constituencies (SMCs)
• Group Representation Constituencies (GRCs)

Single Member Constituencies (SMCs)

• An SMC is an electoral division that has a single Member of Parliament (MP) representing the interests of those residents in the electoral division.
• Thus, during a by-election in the SMC or a general election, the registered electors of the SMC will vote for a single individual to be their MP.
• The Parliamentary Elections Act requires that there must be at least 8 SMCs at any time.

Group Representation Constituencies (GRCs)

• A GRC is a larger electoral division, both in terms of population as well as physical area. A group of MPs represents the interests of those residents in the electoral division.
• Thus, during a general election or by-election in the GRC, the registered electors of the GRC will vote for a group of individuals to be their MPs, who must be from the same political party or are all independents.
• The group may be made up of three to six individuals. The President declares the group number for each GRC by law.
• At least one of the MPs in the group representing a GRC must belong to a minority racial community, either the Malay community or the Indian and other minority communities.
• By law, the President designates the GRCs for which at least one of the MPs in the electoral division must belong to one of these minority racial communities. However, the number of GRCs that can be designated as those belonging to the Malay community cannot be more than three-fifths the total number of GRCs, rounded to the next higher whole number.
• The GRC system was established in 1988 to ensure that the minority racial communities in Singapore will always be represented in Parliament. To ensure this, the Parliamentary Elections Act requires that at least one-quarter of the total number of MPs must be representatives of GRCs.

There are a total of 2,653,942 electors in the Registers of Electors of the 31 electoral divisions as of 15 Apr 2020. The list of electoral divisions and the number of electors in each electoral division is set out below.

Table A: SMCs

Table B: GRCs with at least one member belonging to the
Malay community

Table C: GRCs with at least one member belonging to the
Indian or other minority communities

Data as of 15 Apr 2020

Chapter Study Outline

Introduction

Although recent presidents have encountered numerous political troubles, the institution of the American presidency has grown in power and prominence over the past century. Designed as a “unitary” office, the presidency possesses a capacity for quick decision and action. In the twentieth century, a strong executive emerged and was institutionalized in American national politics as the power of the president, the office of the presidency and the executive branch, and popular expectations for strong presidential leadership all increased. Even though the framers anticipated that Congress would be the predominant branch of government, contemporary presidents wield formidable formal and informal resources of governance.

1. The Constitutional Basis of the Presidency

What was the character of the presidency that the Constitution established? How did the process of presidential selection help to define this character? How have changes in presidential selection affected presidential leadership?

• Article II of the Constitution vested the executive power in an independent, unitary president of the United States. Although some delegates to the Constitutional Convention favored a multi-person “executive council,” most framers thought a unitary (single-person) executive was preferable because it could take quick and aggressive action.
• Much of Article II is devoted to setting forth how the president will be selected. As opposed to Congress or the people selecting the president, the Constitution established the “electoral college” as an indirect means of electing the president, thus making the executive responsible to the state and national legislators rather than to the electorate.
• Presidential independence of Congress was strengthened in the nineteenth century as party conventions displaced the less democratic caucus system (known as “King Caucus”) and nominations of presidential candidates became more democratized; the continued democratization of presidential selection with the eventual adoption of the system of primary elections in the twentieth century further enhanced presidential independence.

2. The Constitutional Powers of the Presidency

With what types of constitutional powers is the president endowed? How have these powers changed over time?

• Scholars cite three main types of presidential powers: expressed powers, delegated powers, and inherent powers.
• Expressed powers are those powers specifically granted to the president in Article II, Sections 2 and 3, of the Constitution.
• Given that Article II declares that the president “shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed,” when Congress enacts laws, it delegates power to the president and the executive branch to implement its will; such delegated powers constitute an important, expandable source of presidential strength.
• Inherent powers are those that presidents claim that are not expressed in the Constitution but are inferred from it; they are most often asserted during times of war or national emergency.
• The president’s expressed powers, as defined by Article II, Sections 2 and 3, include military, judicial, diplomatic, executive, and legislative powers.
• As “Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States,” the president possesses military powers and heads the nation’s security and intelligence agencies; these powers also include deploying troops to enforce federal decisions and declarations of “states of emergency.” In response to presidential unilateralism, in 1973 Congress passed the War Powers Resolution.
• The president exercises judicial power when he or she grants pardons, reprieves, and amnesty.
• As “head of state,” the president has the diplomatic powers to make treaties (though their ratification requires Senate approval), receive ambassadors, and create executive agreements.
• The president also possesses executive powers that include the duty to see that all laws are faithfully executed and the power to appoint principal executive officers and federal judges (though this requires Senate approval); as chief executive, the president enjoys a power known as “executive privilege,” which makes confidential the communications between the president and his or her advisers and adds to executive power.
• Charged by the Constitution with “giv[ing] to the Congress Information of the State of the Union” and the power to veto legislation, presidents also have powers in the legislative process; these legislative powers have been transformed and expanded to include legislative initiative, the ability to bring a legislative agenda before Congress, and the issuance of executive orders that instruct the executive branch and often have the effect of legislation. For example, soon after taking office, President Barack Obama seized the initiative in presenting Congress with a budget proposal designed to address America’s financial crisis and recessed economy.
• Presidents’ delegated powers are those not found in the Constitution but rather are the products of congressional statutes and resolutions.
• Congress has, for the most part, volunteered to delegate legislative authority to the executive since it cannot administer all of the laws and programs it creates.
• The scope and degree of specificity of congressional delegations varies by legislation and over time.

3. The Rise of Presidential Government

What was the president’s role during the era of legislative supremacy from 1800 to 1933? How did Franklin Roosevelt transform the power of the presidency and facilitate the rise of presidential government?

• Consistent with the Constitution’s clear intent of legislative supremacy, the nineteenth and early twentieth century are characterized as a “Legislative Epoch” in which American government was deemed by Woodrow Wilson to be “Congressional Government” and in which presidents were often seen as little more than “chief clerks” implementing Congress’s will.
• Not linked to or representative of major national and social forces, the nineteenth-century presidency left only occasional room for presidential greatness.
• The rise of national conventions in the 1830s strengthened the office somewhat, though Congress kept a tight rein on powers of the presidency.
• The modern presidency began with Franklin D. Roosevelt (FDR), who in his first 100 days in office took the reins of the executive branch and eventually promoted policies in Congress that transformed the size and character of American national government.
• These newly passed programs provided for national government intervention in American economic life and challenged the traditional balance of power in federalism and the separation of powers.
• The New Deal programs took decisive action to expand the role of the national government.
• Increased congressional delegation led to enhanced executive powers, and the Supreme Court eventually upheld the New Deal’s federalism changes and broad delegations. Power was given to FDR because of the economic crisis of the Great Depression.

4. Presidential Government

With the locus of policy decision making shifting from the Congress to the executive branch, how is presidential government performed and legitimated? What are the formal resources of presidential power? What are the contemporary political bases of presidential government? And how do presidents lead the expanded administrative state?

• Presidential government is based, in part, on a number of formal, institutional resources including the cabinet, the White House staff, the executive office of the president, and the vice presidency.
• The secretaries of the major departments of the national government constitute the president’s cabinet of advisers, which serves as a source of political support and policy coordination and advice; an “inner cabinet” in the National Security Council was established in 1947 and provides the president with expert intelligence and foreign policy advice.
• The White House staff of analysts and advisers to the president is an important source of information and a management tool for presidents seeking to control the broader executive branch.
• The Executive Office of the President (EOP) is part of the broader group of permanent agencies that perform management tasks for the president. These agencies include the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)—the largest and most important—as well as the Council of Economic Advisers and the National Security Council.
• The vice president and the office of the vice presidency serve as important political and management resources for the institutional presidency, too.
• Taken collectively, the president’s institutional resources have helped presidents gain greater control over public policy decisions in the legislative and administrative processes.
• Contemporary presidents have expanded their power by three chief means: party, popular mobilization, and administration.
• Presidents rely on their own party as a source of power, often calling upon partisan institutions and leaders to exert influence in the legislative process. Presidents often face difficulties during periods of divided government, when the other party controls at least one of the two chambers of Congress.
• “Going public” is a term referring to modern presidents’ use of the mass media to appeal directly to the electorate for support on a particular issue; critics claim that this has led to a permanent campaign in the presidential leadership.
• Employing various forms of leverage over the expanded administrative state, contemporary presidents seek to influence policy and govern sometimes even without congressional, partisan, or public support.
• Increasing the reach and power of the Executive Office of the President, presidents seek to control the executive branch, particularly through OMB’s ability to approve or disapprove of federal agencies’ spending requests.
• Exerting similar review over agencies’ abilities to propose and promulgate regulatory rules, as well as by appointing loyal supporters to top jobs, the White House has increased its control over the federal bureaucracy.
• Expanding the use of executive orders and other instruments of direct presidential governance, contemporary presidents do a great deal of governing “by decree.”
• In recent years, presidents have used signing statements, policy statements made when the president signs a bill into law, to shape the interpretation and implementation of laws passed by Congress. Although signing statements have a longer history, presidents since Ronald Reagan have used them to affect policy; this practice and the controversies surrounding it reached a high point during the administration of George W. Bush.

5. Presidential Power: Myths and Realities

Must presidential power increase during times of emergency? Are presidents better guardians of the public interest than Congress? Is the presidency a more democratic branch of government than the Congress? That is, does the president have closer ties to the people than Congress does?

• Although the unity of the presidency allows for the “dispatch” and secrecy needed to respond to emergencies (particularly those involving national security), the framers of the Constitution gave many of the powers to respond to security threats to Congress and Congress rarely, if ever, fails to respond to national emergencies. Moreover, accumulated presidential power, it seems, is not reserved for emergencies; rather, presidents use it routinely.
• Some have argued that expanded presidential power is a good thing because presidents are better positioned to perceive and represent the “national good,” particularly compared to a Congress that is overly focused on re-election and local interests. Still, enough examples of presidential personal ambition, partisanship, and preference for special interests exist to challenge this alleged truism.
• Advocates of presidential power also claim that presidents, as representatives of national constituencies, are closer to the people than Congress. But much of the actual exercise of presidential power takes place in secret (indeed, a constitutionally protected secrecy), rendering much of presidential politics too far removed from the people to justify this questionable assumption.

Why do the different constituencies of the president and Congress cause conflict between the executive and legislative branches quizlet?

How do differences in the constituencies create conflicts between the president and members of Congress quizlet?

How does the difference in constituencies between the president and members of Congress create tension?

How does the political party system contribute to conflict between the president and Congress quizlet?