What is the failure of taking responsibility actions to protect others from harm?

What is the failure of taking responsibility actions to protect others from harm?

Duty of Care is about individual wellbeing, welfare, compliance and good practice.

All workplaces, whether a school, a business, or a voluntary organisation have a moral and a legal obligation to ensure that everyone associated with the establishment, whether employee, volunteer, student, tradesperson or the general public, is fully protected from any personal physical and/or emotional harm, either on the premises or when engaged in activities relating to the establishment.

Typical areas of concern are fire safety, health and safety, food safety, personal safety, child and adult protection (plus wider safeguarding such as safer recruitment), equality, bullying, violence, harassment, stress, or discrimination from any source.

A breach of duty occurs when one person or an organisation has a duty of care toward another person or organisation but fails to live up to that standard. A person may be liable for negligence in a personal injury case if their breach of duty caused another person's injuries or mental ill health.

By being able to demonstrate that anyone requiring training on these areas has been trained and is up to date, the employer is able to provide evidence that they have taken reasonable precautions to ensure that the wellbeing of every person associated with the establishment is supported.

A clear benefit for the employer is that when everyone associated with their organisation can see that their wellbeing is important they feel much more valued and it builds trust and job satisfaction. They will also feel empowered to raise concerns about unsafe practice and to act on their concerns.

By taking effective steps to ensure that all relevant individuals receive the right training the organisation can promote good practice, reduce risk, eliminate ignorance and create and sustain a safe environment.

How is this achieved:

  • By making a clear policy statement on duty of care. Ignorance is no excuse
  • Training all relevant individuals on the basic issues
  • Keeping the training up to date
  • Keeping up-to-date training records and displaying certification
  • Providing clear communication channels for reporting concerns
  • Recording concerns and all further actions taken
  • Reporting outcomes.

Consequences of breaching Duty of Care Obligations

The consequences of breaching duty of care obligations are typically financial and reputational which can place an organisation or an individual under severe pressure.

Financial settlements can be made under a personal agreement, but are more likely to be decided in courts of law. This is typically very expensive and time-consuming and can also result in significant negative publicity; damaging the organisation’s reputation and affecting the morale of other people associated with the organisation.

EduCare can help

As experts in Duty of Care our comprehensive e-learning services contain a complete portfolio of up-to-date courses that will ensure that all staff are fully trained in all essential duty of care topics and a robust reporting suite that evidences all learning.

Return to news

   

Personal injury and tort cases bring with them explicit legal terminology, including the terms “reasonable care” and “negligence.” But, what do these terms actually mean? Here, attorney Douglas Lauenstein breaks down these common phrases, and explains their implications in a personal injury or tort case.

How is Reasonable Care Defined?

Reasonable care is “the degree of caution and concern for the safety of the self and others an ordinarily prudent and rational person would use in the same circumstances.” It acts as a minimum standard that must be met, and failure to provide reasonable care in a situation can leave a defendant in a position to be accused of negligence.

What is an Example of Reasonable Care?

There is a duty of “reasonable care” for drivers of vehicles on public highways. A driver may fail to abide by the State of Maryland statutory rules of the road, while driving and cause an accident.  In this case the driver would have failed to provide “reasonable care” and may be held responsible for damages under the tort theory of negligence.

How is Negligence Defined?

Negligence is a failure to act reasonably and carefully, resulting in injury or harm to another person. There are several aspects that must be met to prove negligence. They include: duty, breach, causation, and damages. Duty means that the defendant owed a legal duty to the plaintiff under the circumstances, and breach is the failure to act upon that duty. If the defendant’s actions caused the injury or harm to the plaintiff, that is considered causation, and damages encompass any injuries or harm to the plaintiff as a result of the defendant’s action or inaction.

What is an Example of Negligence?

As an example, let’s assume that a surgeon is performing an operation on a patient. Before beginning the procedure, the surgeon fails to properly sanitize their hands. Because of this lack of sanitation, the patient suffers from sepsis, leading to additional treatment, serious injury, extensive medical bills and time away from work. In this example, the surgeon has a legal duty as the patient is under their care. By not following reasonable care, the surgeon has breached that duty, and their failure to meet sanitation standards caused the patient’s sepsis. As a result, the sepsis caused pain, suffering, hefty medical bills and lost work wages. If each of these elements is explicitly proven through medical documentation and additional evidence, negligence can be proven, and the surgeon would likely be sued for compensation.

How Douglas Lauenstein Can Help with Your Personal Injury or Tort Case

Dedicated personal injury attorney, Douglas Lauenstein works diligently for those who suffered at the hands of negligence. Don’t walk the painful path of personal injury alone—you deserve justice for your injuries. Contact The Lauenstein Law Firm today for a legal consultation.

What is the term that means legally responsible for causing harm?

one of the most significant words in the field of law, liability means legal responsibility for one's acts or omissions.

What is an example of nonfeasance?

A nonfeasance example is a doctor failing to perform life-saving interventions or a nurse failing to either call for a doctor or help by using a defibrillator when a patient goes into cardiac arrest. Nonfeasance can also apply if a daycare worker fails to supervise children, causing serious harm.

What is the meaning of nonfeasance in law?

The omission to perform a required duty or the failure to act when a duty to act existed. Nonfeasance can more loosely be defined as “not doing something which you ought to do.” The term “nonfeasance” commonly appears in the areas of contract and tort law.

What is the negligence meaning?

Definition. A failure to behave with the level of care that someone of ordinary prudence would have exercised under the same circumstances. The behavior usually consists of actions, but can also consist of omissions when there is some duty to act (e.g., a duty to help victims of one's previous conduct).