General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked. Show
Pipelines / CUDA cores1152640CUDA cores1152640Core clock speed980 MHz1354 MHzBoost clock speed1033 MHz1493 MHzNumber of transistors3,540 million3,300 millionManufacturing process technology28 nm14 nmPower consumption (TDP)170 Watt75 WattMaximum GPU temperature97 °C97 °CTexture fill rate94.1 billion/sec59.72Floating-point performance2,378 gflopsno data Size and compatibilityInformation on GeForce GTX 760 and GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard. Laptop sizeno datalargeBus supportPCI Express 3.0PCIe 3.0InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16Length9.5" (24.1 cm)no dataHeight4.376" (11.1 cm)no dataWidth2-slotno dataMinimum recommended system power500 Wattno dataSupplementary power connectorsTwo 6-pinno dataSLI options+- MemoryParameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM. Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5Maximum RAM amount2 GB4000 MBMemory bus width256 Bit128 BitMemory clock speed3000 MHz7008 MHzMemory bandwidth192.2 GB/s112 GB/sShared memory-- Video outputs and portsTypes and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself. Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPortDP 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVIMulti monitor support4 displays+HDMI+no dataHDCP+2.2Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no dataG-SYNC supportno data+Audio input for HDMIInternalno data TechnologiesSupported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes. Blu Ray 3D+no data3D Gaming+no data3D Vision+no dataPhysX+no dataGameStreamno data+GPU Boostno data3.03D Vision Live+no dataAnselno data+ API supportList of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions. DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)Shader Model5.16.4OpenGL4.34.5OpenCL1.21.2Vulkan1.1.1261.2.131CUDA++ Synthetic benchmark performanceNon-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale. Combined synthetic benchmark scoreThis is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly. 760 outperforms 1050 Mobile by 7% in our combined benchmark results. PassmarkThis is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities. Benchmark coverage: 25% 760 outperforms 1050 Mobile by 7% in Passmark. 3DMark Vantage Performance3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead. Benchmark coverage: 17% 760 outperforms 1050 Mobile by 9% in 3DMark Vantage Performance. 3DMark 11 Performance GPU3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy. Benchmark coverage: 17% 760 outperforms 1050 Mobile by 3% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU. 3DMark Fire Strike GraphicsFire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware. Benchmark coverage: 14% GTX 1050 Mobile 6068 +1.8% 1050 Mobile outperforms 760 by 2% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics. 3DMark Cloud Gate GPUCloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid. Benchmark coverage: 14% 760 outperforms 1050 Mobile by 6% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU. Unigine Heaven 3.0This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark using Unigine, a 3D game engine by eponymous Russian company. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. Version 3.0 was released in 2012, and in 2013 it was superseded by Heaven 4.0, which introduced several slight improvements, including a newer version of Unigine. Benchmark coverage: 4% 1050 Mobile outperforms 760 by 4% in Unigine Heaven 3.0. Mining hashratesCryptocurrency mining performance of GeForce GTX 760 and GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile. Usually measured in megahashes per second. Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 83 Mh/s no data Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) 3.5 Mh/s no data Gaming performanceLet's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS. Average FPS across all PC gamesHere are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions: 900p75−80 +2.7% 73 −2.7% Full HD67 +45.7% 46 −45.7% 1440p24−27 +0% 24 +0% 4K16−18 +6.7% 15 −6.7% Performance in popular gamesFull HD Low Preset Cyberpunk 207718−20 16−18 Full HD Medium Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey24−27 −42.3% 37 +42.3% Assassin's Creed Valhalla20−22 +11.1% 18−20 −11.1% Battlefield 540−45 −21.4% 51 +21.4% Call of Duty: Modern Warfare30−35 −25% 40 +25% Cyberpunk 207718−20 +18.8% 16−18 −18.8% Far Cry 530−35 −21.9% 39 +21.9% Far Cry New Dawn30−35 −11.8% 38 +11.8% Forza Horizon 440−45 −27.9% 55 +27.9% Hitman 330−35 +10% 30−33 −10% Horizon Zero Dawn24−27 +8.3% 24−27 −8.3% Red Dead Redemption 221−24 −28.6% 27 +28.6% Shadow of the Tomb Raider24−27 −26.9% 33 +26.9% Watch Dogs: Legion21−24 +9.5% 21−24 −9.5% Full HD High Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey24−27 −15.4% 30 +15.4% Assassin's Creed Valhalla20−22 +11.1% 18−20 −11.1% Battlefield 540−45 −4.8% 44 +4.8% Call of Duty: Modern Warfare30−35 −3.1% 33 +3.1% Cyberpunk 207718−20 +18.8% 16−18 −18.8% Far Cry 530−35 −12.5% 36 +12.5% Far Cry New Dawn30−35 −8.8% 37 +8.8% Forza Horizon 440−45 −20.9% 52 +20.9% Hitman 330−35 +10% 30−33 −10% Horizon Zero Dawn24−27 +8.3% 24−27 −8.3% Metro Exodus18−20 +0% 19 +0% Red Dead Redemption 221−24 +50% 14 −50% Shadow of the Tomb Raider24−27 −11.5% 29 +11.5% The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt24−27 −50% 39 +50% Watch Dogs: Legion21−24 +9.5% 21−24 −9.5% Full HD Ultra Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey24−27 +44.4% 18 −44.4% Assassin's Creed Valhalla20−22 +11.1% 18−20 −11.1% Battlefield 540−45 +13.5% 37 −13.5% Cyberpunk 207718−20 +18.8% 16−18 −18.8% Far Cry 530−35 −3.1% 33 +3.1% Far Cry New Dawn30−35 +3% 33 −3% Forza Horizon 440−45 +16.2% 37 −16.2% The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt24−27 +18.2% 22 −18.2% Watch Dogs: Legion21−24 +9.5% 21−24 −9.5% 1440p High Preset Call of Duty: Modern Warfare18−20 +0% 18 +0% Hitman 318−20 +18.8% 16−18 −18.8% Horizon Zero Dawn18−20 +12.5% 16−18 −12.5% Metro Exodus10−12 +0% 11 +0% Red Dead Redemption 29−10 +12.5% 8−9 −12.5% Shadow of the Tomb Raider16−18 −6.3% 17 +6.3% 1440p Ultra Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey12−14 −8.3% 13 +8.3% Assassin's Creed Valhalla8−9 +14.3% 7−8 −14.3% Battlefield 524−27 −8.3% 26 +8.3% Cyberpunk 20776−7 +20% 5−6 −20% Far Cry 520−22 −5% 21 +5% Far Cry New Dawn21−24 −9.1% 24 +9.1% Forza Horizon 424−27 −8.3% 26 +8.3% The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt14−16 +25% 12−14 −25% Watch Dogs: Legion7−8 +16.7% 6−7 −16.7% 4K High Preset Call of Duty: Modern Warfare8−9 −25% 10 +25% Hitman 310−12 +10% 10−11 −10% Horizon Zero Dawn10−11 +11.1% 9−10 −11.1% Metro Exodus5−6 −40% 7 +40% Red Dead Redemption 27−8 +16.7% 6−7 −16.7% Shadow of the Tomb Raider7−8 −14.3% 8 +14.3% The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt10−12 +10% 10−11 −10% 4K Ultra Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey7−8 +0% 7 +0% Assassin's Creed Valhalla5−6 +25% 4−5 −25% Battlefield 512−14 −8.3% 13 +8.3% Cyberpunk 20772−3 +100% 1−2 −100% Far Cry 510−11 −10% 11 +10% Far Cry New Dawn12−14 +18.2% 11 −18.2% Forza Horizon 416−18 +6.7% 15 −6.7% Watch Dogs: Legion4−5 +33.3% 3−4 −33.3% This is how GTX 760 and GTX 1050 Mobile compete in popular games: 900p resolution:
1080p resolution:
1440p resolution:
4K resolution:
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
All in all, in popular games:
Advantages and disadvantagesPerformance score 12.33 11.49 Recency 25 June 2013 3 January 2017 Memory bus width 256 128 Pipelines / CUDA cores 1152 640 Memory bandwidth 192.2 112 Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm Power consumption (TDP) 170 Watt 75 Watt We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 760 and GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile. The differences in performance seem too small. Be aware that GeForce GTX 760 is a desktop card while GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile is a notebook one. Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer. Cast your own voteDo you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card. GeForce GTX 760 GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile Similar GPU comparisonsWe selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider. User ratings: view and submitHere you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself. Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 on a scale of 1 to 5:  Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5: Questions and commentsHere you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch. |
