How are the biological and evolutionary perspectives on psychology similar

An evolutionary perspective of personality and individual differences proposes that our personalities and individual differences have evolved, in part, to provide us with some form of adaptive advantage in the context of survival and reproduction. This perspective is an evolutionary psychology perspective, which in itself is based on biological evolutionary theory. Evolutionary psychology integrates psychological theory with evolutionary biology, in an effort to understand traits, cognition, and behaviors, and how individuals may differ across these in light of achieving their evolutionary goals.

Introduction

Evolutionary perspectives of personality and individual differences are attempts at explaining our human traits and characteristics at a species level, group level (e.g., male and female differences, differences in specific personality traits), and at an individual level (i.e., how each of us are...

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Arak, A., & Enquist, M. (1993). Hidden preferences and the evolution of signals. Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences, 340, 207–213.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Arnqvist, G., & Rowe, L. (2002). Antagonistic coevolution between the sexes in a group of insects. Nature, 415, 787. https://doi.org/10.1038/415787a.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 150–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868306294907.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Belsky, J., Steinberg, L., & Draper, P. (1991). Childhood experience, interpersonal development, and reproductive strategy: An evolutionary theory of socialization. Child Development, 62, 647–670. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1991.tb01558.x.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bogg, T., & Roberts, B. W. (2004). Conscientiousness and health-related behaviors: A meta-analysis of the leading behavioral contributors to mortality. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 887–919. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.130.6.887.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bratko, D., Butković, A., & Hlupić, T. V. (2017). Heritability of personality. Psychological Topics, 26, 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, T., Johnson, J. A., & Goldberg, L. R. (2005). Implementing a five-factor personality inventory for use on the internet. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 21, 115–127. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.21.2.115.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M. (1995). Evolutionary psychology: A new paradigm for psychological science. Psychological Inquiry, 6, 1–30.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M. (2017). Sexual conflict in human mating. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26, 307–313. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417695559.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M., & Duntley, J. D. (2008). Adaptations for exploitation. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 12, 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.12.1.53.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M., Haselton, M. G., Shackelford, T. K., Bleske, A. L., & Wakefield, J. C. (1998). Adaptations, exaptations, and spandrels. American Psychologist, 53, 533–548.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M., & Penke, L. (2015). Evolutionary personality psychology. In M. Mikulincer & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology: Personality processes and individual differences (Vol. 4, pp. 3–29). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–232.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M., & Shackelford, T. K. (1997). Susceptibility to infidelity in the first year of marriage. Journal of Research in Personality, 31, 193–221. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.1997.2175.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Camperio Ciani, A. (2010). Testing the evolutionary genetics of personality: Do balanced selection and gene flow cause genetically adapted personality differences in human populations? In D. M. Buss & P. H. Hawley (Eds.), The evolution of personality and individual differences (pp. 425–447). New York: Oxford University Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Camperio Ciani, A., & Capiluppi, C. (2011). Gene flow by selective emigration as a possible cause for personality differences between small islands and mainland populations. European Journal of Personality, 25, 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.774.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Caspi, A., Roberts, B. W., & Shiner, R. L. (2005). Personality development: Stability and change. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 453–484. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141913.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, B. P., Roberts, B., & Duberstein, P. (2011). Personality and longevity: Knowns, unknowns, and implications for public health and personalized medicine. Journal of Aging Research, 2011, 759170. https://doi.org/10.4061/2011/759170.

    CrossRef  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, T., Arnqvist, G., Bangham, J., & Rowe, L. (2003). Sexual conflict. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 18, 41–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(02)00004-6.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (2005). Neurocognitive adaptations designed for social exchange. In D. M. Buss (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 584–627). Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. (1859). On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. London: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. (1880). The evidence of the descent of man from some lower form descent of man, and selection in relation to sex: New edition, revised and augmented (pp. 5–25). New York: D Appleton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Del Giudice, M. (2016). The life history model of psychopathology explains the structure of psychiatric disorders and the emergence of the p factor: A simulation study. Clinical Psychological Science, 4, 299–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702615583628.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Del Giudice, M., & Ellis, B. J. (2016). Evolutionary foundations of developmental psychopathology. In D. Cicchettit (Ed.), Developmental neuroscience (Vol. 2, 3rd ed., pp. 1–58). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Del Giudice, M., Gangestad, S. W., & Kaplan, H. S. (2015). Life history theory and evolutionary psychology. In D. M. Buss (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 1 Foundations, pp. 88–114). Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eaves, L. J., Martin, N. G., Heath, A. C., Hewitt, J. K., & Neale, M. C. (1990). Personality and reproductive fitness. Behavior Genetics, 20, 563–568. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01065872.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, D. T., Campbell, B., Gray, P. B., & Sorenson, M. D. (2008). Dopamine receptor genetic polymorphisms and body composition in undernourished pastoralists: An exploration of nutrition indices among nomadic and recently settled Ariaal men of northern Kenya. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 8, 173. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-8-173.

    CrossRef  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, B. J., Bates, J. E., Dodge, K. A., Fergusson, D. M., Horwood, L. J., Pettit, G. S., & Woodward, L. (2003). Does father absence place daughters at special risk for early sexual activity and teenage pregnancy? Child Development, 74, 801–821. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00569.

    CrossRef  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, B. J., McFadyen-Ketchum, S., Dodge, K. A., Pettit, G. S., & Bates, J. E. (1999). Quality of early family relationships and individual differences in the timing of pubertal maturation in girls: A longitudinal test of an evolutionary model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 387–401.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Figueredo, A. J., Gladden, P., Vásquez, G., Sofio, P., Wolf, A., & Jones, D. N. (2009). Evolutionary theories of personality. In P. J. Corr & G. Matthews (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personality psychology (pp. 265–274). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Fleeson, W., & Gallagher, M. P. (2009). The implications of big-five standing for the distribution of trait manifestation in behavior: Fifteen experience-sampling studies and a meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 1097–1114. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016786.

    CrossRef  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gangestad, S. W. (2011). Evolutionary processes explaining the genetic variance in personality: An exploration of scenarios. In D. M. Buss & P. H. Hawley (Eds.), The evolution of personality and individual differences (pp. 338–375). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gangestad, S. W., & Simpson, J. A. (1990). Toward an evolutionary history of female sociosexual variation. Journal of Personality, 58, 69–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1990.tb00908.x.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Giosan, C., & Wyka, K. (2009). Is a successful high-K fitness strategy associated with better mental health? Evolutionary Psychology, 7, 28–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470490900700104.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Haselton, M. G., & Buss, D. M. (2000). Error management theory: A new perspective on biases in cross-sex mind reading. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.1.81.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hurst, J. E., & Kavanagh, P. S. (2017). Life history strategies and psychopathology: The faster the life strategies, the more symptoms of psychopathology. Evolution and Human Behavior, 38, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2016.06.001.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ishikawa, S. S., Raine, A., Lencz, T., Bihrle, S., & LaCasse, L. (2001). Increased height and bulk in antisocial personality disorder and its subtypes. Psychiatry Research, 105, 211–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1781(01)00344-4.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • John, O. P., Naumann, L. P., & Soto, C. J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative big five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 114–158). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, A. M., Vernon, P. A., & Feiler, A. R. (2008). Behavioral genetic studies of personality: An introduction and review of the results of 50+ years of research. In G. J. Boyle, G. Matthews, & D. H. Saklofske (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of personality theory and assessment: Personality theories and models (Vol. 1, pp. 145–173). London: SAGE.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, W., Penke, L., & Spinath, F. M. (2011). Heritability in the era of molecular genetics: Some thoughts for understanding genetic influences on behavioural traits. European Journal of Personality, 25, 254–266. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.836.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Jonason, P. K., Foster, J. D., Egorova, M. S., Parshikova, O., Csathó, Á., Oshio, A., & Gouveia, V. V. (2017). The dark triad traits from a life history perspective in six countries. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1476. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01476.

    CrossRef  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, H. S., & Gangestad, S. W. (2005). Life history theory and evolutionary psychology. In D. M. Buss (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 68–95). Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kavanagh, P. S., & Kahl, B. L. (2016). Life history theory. In T. K. Shackelford & V. A. Weekes-Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of evolutionary psychological science (pp. 1–12). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_1914-1.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Litchfield, C. A., Quinton, G., Tindle, H., Chiera, B., Kikillus, K. H., & Roetman, P. (2017). The ‘feline five’: An exploration of personality in pet cats (Felis catus). PLoS One, 12, e0183455. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183455.

    CrossRef  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lukaszewski, A. W., & Roney, J. R. (2011). The origins of extraversion: Joint effects of facultative calibration and genetic polymorphism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 409–421. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167210397209.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (2008). The five-factor theory of personality. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 159–181). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R., Martin, T. A., Hrebícková, M., Urbánek, T., Boomsma, D. I., Willemsen, G., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (2008). Personality trait similarity between spouses in four cultures. Journal of Personality, 76, 1137–1164. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00517.x.

    CrossRef  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R., Terracciano, A., & 79 Members of the Personality Profiles of Cultures Project. (2005). Personality profiles of cultures: Aggregate personality traits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 407–425. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.3.407.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nettle, D. (2005). An evolutionary approach to the extraversion continuum. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26, 363–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2004.12.004.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Nettle, D., & Clegg, H. (2008). Personality, mating strategies, and mating intelligence. In G. Geher & G. F. Miller (Eds.), Mating intelligence: Sex, relationships, and the mind’s reproductive system (pp. 121–135). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozer, D. J., & Benet-Martínez, V. (2006). Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 401–421. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190127.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Penke, L., Denissen, J. J. A., & Miller, G. F. (2007). The evolutionary genetics of personality. European Journal of Personality. Special Issue: European Personality Reviews, 2007(21), 549–587.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Quinlan, R. J. (2003). Father absence, parental care, and female reproductive development. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 376–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(03)00039-4.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, B. W., & DelVecchio, W. F. (2000). The rank-order consistency of personality traits from childhood to old age: A quantitative review of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 3–25.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, B. W., Kuncel, N. R., Shiner, R., Caspi, A., & Goldberg, L. R. (2007). The power of personality: The comparative validity of personality traits, socioeconomic status, and cognitive ability for predicting important life outcomes. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 313–345. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00047.x.

    CrossRef  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sell, A., Hone, L. S. E., & Pound, N. (2012). The importance of physical strength to human males. Human Nature, 23, 30–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-012-9131-2.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, S. W. (2008). The evolutionary biology of human female sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1990). On the universality of human nature and the uniqueness of the individual: The role of genetics and adaptation. Journal of Personality, 58, 17–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1990.tb00907.x.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1992). The psychological foundations of culture. In J. H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 19–136). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2015). The theoretical foundations of evolutionary psychology. In D. M. Buss (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 1 Foundations, pp. 3–87). Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the decent of man: 1871–1971 (pp. 136–179). Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turiano, N. A., Pitzer, L., Armour, C., Karlamangla, A., Ryff, C. D., & Mroczek, D. K. (2012). Personality trait level and change as predictors of health outcomes: Findings from a national study of Americans (MIDUS). The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 67B, 4–12. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbr072.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Turkheimer, E., Pettersson, E., & Horn, E. E. (2014). A phenotypic null hypothesis for the genetics of personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 515–540. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143752.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vall, G., Gutiérrez, F., Peri, J. M., Gárriz, M., Baillés, E., Garrido, J. M., & Obiols, J. E. (2016). Seven dimensions of personality pathology are under sexual selection in modern Spain. Evolution and Human Behavior, 37, 169–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2015.10.004.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Verweij, K. J. H., Yang, J., Lahti, J., Veijola, J., Hintsanen, M., Pulkki-Råback, L., et al. (2012). Maintenance of genetic variation in human personality: Testing evolutionary models by estimating heritability due to common causal variants and investigating the effect of distant inbreeding. Evolution, 66, 3238–3251. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01679.x.

    CrossRef  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Vukasović, T., & Bratko, D. (2015). Heritability of personality: A meta-analysis of behavior genetic studies. Psychological Bulletin, 141, 769–785. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000015.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, B., & Boyle, E. K. (2016). Hominin taxic diversity: Fact or fantasy? American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 159, 37–78. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.22902.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The School of Psychology, Social Work and Social Policy, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia

    Bianca L. Kahl & Phillip S. Kavanagh

  2. ISN Psychology, Institute for Social Neuroscience, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia

    Phillip S. Kavanagh

  3. The Florey Institute for Neuroscience & Mental Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia

    Phillip S. Kavanagh

Authors

  1. Bianca L. Kahl

    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Phillip S. Kavanagh

    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bianca L. Kahl .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Oakland University, Rochester, USA

    Virgil Zeigler-Hill

  2. Oakland University, Rochester, USA

    Todd K. Shackelford

Section Editor information

  1. Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA

    Glenn Scheyd

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Kahl, B.L., Kavanagh, P.S. (2018). Evolutionary Perspective. In: Zeigler-Hill, V., Shackelford, T. (eds) Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_1632-1

How are biopsychology and evolutionary psychology similar and how are they different?

While biopsychology typically focuses on the immediate causes of behavior based in the physiology of a human or other animal, evolutionary psychology seeks to study the ultimate biological causes of behavior.

What is the biological and evolutionary perspectives?

The evolutionary perspective draws on Darwinian principles of evolution and natural selection to explain how gender differences evolve. Individuals who are fertile, live long enough to reproduce, and are able to raise their offspring will successfully pass on their characteristics to the next generation.

How does biological psychology relate to other perspectives?

The biological perspective is a way of looking at psychological issues by studying the physical basis for animal and human behavior. It is one of the major perspectives in psychology and involves such things as studying the brain, immune system, nervous system, and genetics.

How does evolutionary perspective relates to the study of psychology?

The evolutionary perspective relates to the way that cognitive behaviors go through the process of natural selection just as the human body has done. 2. This perspective also considers the way that emotions, memory, perspective and more have been used in history and have evolved in the current era.