What is risk of material misstatement audit?

Home Audit Audit Risk Model Risk of Material Misstatement

Risk of material misstatement is the risk that any misstatements that exist in the financial statements being audited, could be material either individually or in aggregate.

Misstatement

Misstatement is a difference of an amount, classification, presentation or disclosure between:

  • an item in the financial statements; and
  • the requirement of the accounting standards in this regard

In other words, misstatement includes any difference between what is required by accounting standards and what is included in or omitted from the financial statements.

Material Misstatement

Misstatements in financial statements are material when they can reasonably be expected to influence the decisions taken based on those financial statements. Misstatement can be material either by magnitude or due the nature of the item. For example, an asset would typically be considered material if it is 1% or more of the total assets. Some misstatements are not significant by magnitude but are material by their nature. For example, a loan advanced to a director of a company, however small, is material because the users of financial statements will value such information for decision making purposes.

Misstatements arise from either fraud or error. Intentionally misstating financial statement items for whatever reason is fraudulent financial reporting. However making unintentional misstatments is not fraud.

Some misstatements are factual i.e. when the requirement of accounting standards is clear but not followed. For example, when LIFO inventory method is used under a financial reporting framework that does not allow LIFO or when a figure is incorrectly calculated. Other misstatements are judgmental i.e. when misstatement results from poor or biased judgments regarding estimates, accounting policies etc. For example, when management uses accelerated depreciation method for an asset which generates benefits evenly over its useful life.

Why Focus on Material Misstatements?

Since it is not practical for auditors to detect all the misstatements, they focus their work on detecting material misstatements only. Auditors will first assess the risk of material misstatement during the planning stage of an audit by familiarizing themselves with the company being audited and its environment and controls in place. As the audit progresses, the auditors update their assessment of the risk of material misstatement as they obtain new information. Auditors also consider, the risk that individually immaterial misstatements might add up to have a material impact on the financial statements as whole by using performance materiality.

Different areas of financial statements have varying risks of material misstatements and therefore the auditors will assess the risk at assertion level as well as financial statement level as a whole. The detail with which auditors test various aspects of financial statements depends on their assessment of the risk that material misstatements might exist in a given assertion. The auditors will test an item more thoroughly when their assessment of the risk of material misstatement in that assertion is high.

Components of Risk of Material Misstatement

Risk of material misstatement is a product of the following two risks:

  • Inherent Risk
  • Control Risk

Inherent risk is the susceptibility of a transaction or account balance to material misstatement due its nature. Certain items are by their very nature more likely to be misstated. For example, estimate of a legal obligation.

Control risk is the risk that controls implemented to prevent or correct misstatements will be ineffective in preventing or correcting the misstatements.

This is often represented using the following equation:

Risk of Material Mistatement = Inherent Risk × Control Risk

Risk values are based on auditor’s best judgement and are not quantifieable. Therefore, the above equation is just a means for auditor's understanding of the relationship between risks and not actually used to ‘calculate’ risks.

by Irfanullah Jan, ACCA and last modified on Dec 11, 2018

What Is Audit Risk?

Audit risk is the risk that financial statements are materially incorrect, even though the audit opinion states that the financial reports are free of any material misstatements.

Key Takeaways

  • Audit risk is the risk that financial statements are materially incorrect, even though the audit opinion states that the financial reports are free of any material misstatements.
  • Audit risk may carry legal liability for a certified public accountancy (CPA) firm performing audit work.
  • Auditing firms carry malpractice insurance to manage audit risk and the potential legal liability.
  • The two components of audit risk are risk of material misstatement and detection risk.

Understanding Audit Risk

The purpose of an audit is to reduce the audit risk to an appropriately low level through adequate testing and sufficient evidence. Because creditors, investors, and other stakeholders rely on the financial statements, audit risk may carry legal liability for a certified public accountancy (CPA) firm performing audit work.

Over the course of an audit, an auditor makes inquiries and performs tests on the general ledger and supporting documentation. If any errors are caught during the testing, the auditor requests that management propose correcting journal entries.

At the conclusion of an audit, after any corrections are posted, an auditor provides a written opinion as to whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. Auditing firms carry malpractice insurance to manage audit risk and the potential legal liability.

Types of Audit Risk

The two components of audit risk are the risk of material misstatement and detection risk. Assume, for example, that a large sporting goods store needs an audit performed, and that a CPA firm is assessing the risk of auditing the store's inventory.

Risk of Material Misstatement

Material misstatement risk is the risk that the financial reports are materially incorrect before the audit is performed. In this case, the word "material" refers to a dollar amount that is large enough to change the opinion of a financial statement reader, and the percentage or dollar amount is subjective. If the sporting goods store's inventory balance of $1 million is incorrect by $100,000, a stakeholder reading the financial statements may consider that a material amount. The risk of material misstatement is even higher if there is believed to be insufficient internal controls, which is also a fraud risk.

Detection Risk

Detection risk is the risk that the auditor’s procedures do not detect a material misstatement. For example, an auditor needs to perform a physical count of inventory and compare the results to the accounting records. This work is performed to prove the existence of inventory. If the auditor's test sample for the inventory count is insufficient to extrapolate out to the entire inventory, the detection risk is higher.

What are examples of risk of material misstatement?

Risk of Material Misstatement on a Financial Statement Level.
Managerial incompetence..
Poor oversight by the board of directors..
Inadequate accounting systems and records..
Declining economic conditions..
Operation in rapidly changing industry..

How we identify risks of material misstatements?

In identifying and assessing risks of material misstatement, the auditor should: Identify risks of misstatement using information obtained from performing risk assessment procedures (as discussed in paragraphs . 04-. 58) and considering the characteristics of the accounts and disclosures in the financial statements.

What are the two levels of risk of material misstatement?

The risk of material misstatement refers to the risk that the financial statements are materially misstated and do not present true and fair view. The risk of material misstatement is assessed at two levels (i) financial statements level and (ii) assertions level.

What is an example of material misstatement?

Some misstatements are not significant by magnitude but are material by their nature. For example, a loan advanced to a director of a company, however small, is material because the users of financial statements will value such information for decision making purposes. Misstatements arise from either fraud or error.