General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked. Show
Pipelines / CUDA cores512640CUDA cores512640Core clock speed1020 MHz1020 MHzBoost clock speed1085 MHz1085 MHzNumber of transistors1,870 million1,870 millionManufacturing process technology28 nm28 nmPower consumption (TDP)55 Watt60 WattMaximum GPU temperature95 °Cno dataTexture fill rate34.7243.40Floating-point performance1,111 gflops1,389 gflops Size and compatibilityInformation on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). Bus supportPCI Express 3.0PCI Express 3.0InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16Length5.7" (14.5 cm)5.7" (14.5 cm)Height4.376" (11.1 cm)4.376" (11.1 cm)Width2-slot2-slotSupplementary power connectorsNoneNone MemoryParameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM. Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GBMemory bus width128 Bit128 BitMemory clock speed5.0 GB/s5.4 GB/sMemory bandwidth80 GB/s86.4 GB/sShared memoryno data- Video outputs and portsTypes and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself. Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini-HDMIOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini-HDMIMulti monitor support3 displays4 displaysHDMI++HDCP++Maximum VGA resolution2048x15362048x1536Audio input for HDMIInternalInternal TechnologiesSupported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes. Blu Ray 3D++3D Gaming++3D Vision++3D Vision Live++ API supportList of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions. DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_0)Shader Model5.15.1OpenGL4.44.6OpenCL1.21.2Vulkan1.1.1261.1.126CUDA++ Synthetic benchmark performanceNon-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale. Combined synthetic benchmark scoreThis is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly. 750 Ti outperforms 750 by 16% in our combined benchmark results. PassmarkThis is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities. Benchmark coverage: 25% 750 Ti outperforms 750 by 16% in Passmark. 3DMark Fire Strike GraphicsFire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware. Benchmark coverage: 14% 750 Ti outperforms 750 by 8% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics. GeekBench 5 OpenCLGeekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group. Benchmark coverage: 9% 750 Ti outperforms 750 by 19% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL. GeekBench 5 VulkanGeekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group. Benchmark coverage: 5% 750 Ti outperforms 750 by 1% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan. GeekBench 5 CUDAGeekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA. Benchmark coverage: 4% 750 Ti outperforms 750 by 20% in GeekBench 5 CUDA. Octane Render OctaneBenchThis is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists. Benchmark coverage: 4% 750 Ti outperforms 750 by 25% in Octane Render OctaneBench. Mining hashratesCryptocurrency mining performance of GeForce GTX 750 and GeForce GTX 750 Ti. Usually measured in megahashes per second. Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 143 Mh/s 183 Mh/s Decred / DCR (Decred) no data 0.51 Gh/s Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) no data 2.3 Mh/s Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) no data 0.25 kh/s Zcash / ZEC (Equihash) no data 74.4 Sol/s Gaming performanceLet's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS. Average FPS across all PC gamesHere are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions: Full HD40−45 50 Advantages and disadvantagesPerformance score 8.66 10.05 Cost $119 $149 Pipelines / CUDA cores 512 640 Memory bandwidth 80 86.4 Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 60 Watt The GeForce GTX 750 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 750 in performance tests. Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer. Cast your own voteDo you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card. GeForce GTX 750 GeForce GTX 750 Ti Similar GPU comparisonsWe selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider. User ratings: view and submitHere you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself. Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 on a scale of 1 to 5:  Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5: Questions and commentsHere you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch. |
