Alper, S., Tjosvold, D., & Law, K. S. (1998). Interdependence and controversy in group decision making: Antecedents to effective self-managing teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 74, 33–52. Alper, S., Tjosvold, D.,
& Law, K. S. (2000). Conflict management, efficacy, and performance in self-managing work teams. Personnel Psychology, 53, 625–638. Amason, A. C. (1996). Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making: Resolving a paradox for top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 123–148. Anderson, P. A. (1983). Decision making by objection and the Cuban missile crisis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 201–222. Averill, J. R. (1983). Studies on anger and aggression: Implications for theories of emotion. American Psychologist, 38, 1145–1160. Bacon,
N., & Blyton, P. (2007). Conflict for mutual gains? Journal of Management Studies, 44, 814–834. Baker, W. E., & Sinkula, J. M. (1999). The synergistic effect of market orientation and learning orientation on organizational performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27, 411–427. Barki, H., & Hartwick, J. (2004). Conceptualizing the construct of interpersonal conflict. International Journal of Conflict Management, 15, 216–244. Bass, B. M. (2006). Transformational leadership. Riggio, R. E. 2nd ed. Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates. Bhatnagar, D., & Tjosvold, D. (2012). Leader values for constructive controversy and team effectiveness in India. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23, 109–125. Blake, R., & Mouton, J. (1964). The managerial grid: The key to leadership excellence. Houston, TX: Gulf Publishing
Company. Bond, M. H. (2003). Cross-cultural social psychology and the real world of culturally diverse teams and dyads. In D. Tjosvold & K. Leung (Eds.), Cross-cultural foundations: Traditions for managing in a cross-cultural world (pp. 43–58). Farnham, U.K.: Ashgate. Bradley, B. H., Klotz, A. C.,
Postlethwaite, B. E., & Brown, K. G. (2013). Ready to rumble: How team personality composition and task conflicts interact to improve performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98, 385–392. Cegarra-Navarro, J. G., & Sánchez-Polo, M. T. (2011). Influence of the open-mindedness culture on organizational memory: An empirical investigation of Spanish SMEs.
International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22, 1–18. Chen, G., Liu, C., & Tjosvold, D. (2005). Conflict management for effective top management teams and innovation in China. Journal of Management Studies, 42, 277–300. Chen, Y. F., & Tjosvold, D. (2007).
Cooperative conflict management: An approach to strengthen relationships between foreign managers and Chinese employees. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 45, 271–294. Chen, Y. F., & Tjosvold, D. (2008). Goal interdependence and leader–member relationships for cross-cultural leadership in foreign ventures in China. Leadership & Organization Development Journal,
29, 144–166. Chen, Y. F., & Tjosvold, D. (2013). Inside the leader relationship: Constructive controversy for team effectiveness in China. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43, 1827–1837. Chen, Y. F., Tjosvold, D., Huang, X., & Xu, D. (2011). New manager
socialization and conflict management in China: Effects of relationship and open conflict values. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41, 332–356. Chen, Y. F., Tjosvold, D., & Pan, Y. J. (2010). Collectivist team values for Korean–Chinese co-worker relationships and job performance. International Journal of Intercultural Relationships, 34, 475–481.
Chen, Y. F., Tjosvold, D., & Su, F. (2005). Working with foreign managers: Conflict management for effective leader relationships in China. International Journal of Conflict Management, 16, 265–286. Chen, Y. F., Tjosvold, D., & Wu, P. G. (2008). Effects of relationship
values and goal interdependence on guanxi between foreign managers and Chinese employees. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38, 2440–2486. Choi, J. N., & Sy, T. (2010). Group-level organizational citizenship behavior: Effects of demographic faultlines and conflict in small work groups. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 1032–1054. Chun, J. S., & Choi, J. N. (2014). Members’ needs, intragroup conflict, and group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99, 437–450. Cosier, R. A. (1978). The effects of three potential aids for making strategic decisions on prediction accuracy. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 22,
295–306. De Dreu, C. K. (2006). When too little or too much hurts: Evidence for a curvilinear relationship between task conflict and innovation in teams. Journal of Management, 32, 83–107. De Dreu, C. K. (2007). Cooperative outcome interdependence, task reflexivity, and team effectiveness: A motivated information processing
perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 628–638. De Dreu, C. K., & Boles, T. L. (1998). Share and share alike or winner take all? The influence of social value orientation upon choice and recall of negotiation heuristics. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76, 253–276. De
Dreu, C. K., Koole, S. L., & Steinel, W. (2000). Unfixing the fixed pie: A motivated information-processing approach to integrative negotiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 975–987. De Dreu, C. K., & McCusker, C. (1997). Gain–loss frames and cooperation in two-person social dilemmas: A transformational analysis. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1093–1106. De Dreu, C. K., Nijstad, B. A., & van Knippenberg, D. (2008). Motivated information processing in group judgment and decision making. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 22–49. De Dreu, C. K., & Van Lange, P. A.
(1995). The impact of social value orientations on negotiator cognition and behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 1178–1188. De Dreu, C. K., & Van Vianen, A. E. (2001). Managing relationship conflict and the effectiveness of organizational teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 309–328. De Dreu, C. K., & Weingart, L. R. (2003). Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 741–749. De Dreu, C. K., Weingart, L. R., & Kwon, S. (2000). Influence of social motives on integrative negotiation: A
meta-analytic review and test of two theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 889–905. De Jong, A., Song, M., & Song, L. Z. (2013). How lead founder personality affects new venture performance: The mediating role of team conflict. Journal of Management, 39, 1825–1854. De
Wit, F. R., Greer, L. L., & Jehn, K. A. (2012). The paradox of intragroup conflict: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 360–390. De Wit, F. R., Jehn, K. A., & Scheepers, D. (2013). Task conflict, information processing, and decision-making: The damaging effect of relationship conflict. Organizational Behavior and Human
Decision Processes, 122, 177–189. DeChurch, L. A., Mesmer-Magnus, J. R., & Doty, D. (2013). Moving beyond relationship and task conflict: Toward a process-state perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98, 559–578. Deutsch, M. (1948). The effects of cooperation and competition
upon group process. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Deutsch, M. (1973). The resolution of conflict. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Deutsch, M., Coleman, P. T., & Marcus, E. (2011). The handbook of conflict resolution: Theory and practice. San Francisco, CA:
Jossey-Bass. Eisenbeiss, S. A. (2012). Re-thinking ethical leadership: An interdisciplinary integrative approach. Leadership Quarterly, 23, 791–808. Eisenbeiss, S. A., van Knippenberg, D., & Boerner, S. (2008). Transformational leadership and team innovation: Integrating team climate principles.
Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 1438–1446. Eisenhardt, K. M., Kahwajy, J. L., & Bourgeois, L. J. (1997). How management teams can have a good fight. Harvard Business Review, 75(4), 77–85. Farh, J. L., Lee, C., & Farh, C. I. (2010). Task conflict and
team creativity: A question of how much and when. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 1173–1180. Follett, M. P. (1940). Constructive conflict. In H. C. Metcalf & L. Urwick (Eds.), Dynamic administration: The collected papers of Mary Parker Follett (pp. 183–209). New York: Harper. Friedman, R.,
Chi, S. C., & Liu, L. A. (2006). An expectancy model of Chinese–American differences in conflict-avoiding. Journal of International Business Studies, 37, 76–91. Galinsky, A., & Schweitzer, M. (2015). Friend & foe: When to cooperate, when to compete, and how to succeed at both. New York: Crown Business. George, A. L. (1974). Adaptation to stress in political decision making: The individual, small group, and organizational contexts. In G. V. Coelho, D. A. Hamburg, & J. E. Adams (Eds.), Coping and adaptation (pp. 176–245). New York: Basic Books. Gibson, D. E., & Callister, R. R. (2010). Anger
in organizations: Review and integration. Journal of Management, 36, 66–93. Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader–member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years; Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. Leadership Quarterly, 6, 219–247. Gruenfeld, D. H. (1995). Status, ideology, and integrative complexity on the US Supreme Court: Rethinking the politics of political decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 5–20. Hempel, P. S., Zhang, Z. X., & Tjosvold, D. (2009). Conflict management between and within teams for trusting
relationships and performance in China. Journal of Organization Behavior, 30, 41–65. Hui, C., Wong, A., & Tjosvold, D. (2007). Turnover intention and performance in China: The role of positive affectivity, Chinese values, perceived organizational support and constructive controversy. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80, 735–751.
Humphrey, S. E., Aime, F., Cushenbery, L., Hill, A. D., & Fairchild, J. (2017). Team conflict dynamics: Implications of a dyadic view of conflict for team performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 142, 58–70. Jehn, K. A. (1994). Enhancing effectiveness:
An investigation of advantages and disadvantages of value-based intragroup conflict. International Journal of Conflict Management, 5, 223–238. Jehn, K. A. (1995). A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 256–282. Jehn, K. A. (1997). A
qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organizational groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 530–557. Jehn, K. A., Greer, L., Levine, S., & Szulanski, G. (2008). The effects of conflict types, dimensions, and emergent states on group outcomes. Group Decision and Negotiation, 17, 465–495. Jiang, J. Y., Zhang, X., & Tjosvold, D. (2012). Emotion regulation as a boundary condition of the relationship between team conflict and performance: A multi-level examination. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34, 714–734. Johnson, D. W. (2015). Constructive controversy: Theory, research, practice.
Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Tjosvold, D. (2006). Constructive controversy: The value of intellectual opposition. In M. Deutsch, P. T. Coleman, & E. Marcus (Eds.), The handbook of conflict resolution: Theory and practice (pp. 69–91). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Kelley, H. H., & Schenitzki, D. P. (1972). Bargaining. In C. G. McClintock (Ed.), Experimental social psychology (pp. 298–337). New York: Holt. Kirkbride, P. S., Tang, S. F. Y., & Westwood, R. I. (1991). Chinese conflict preferences and negotiating behaviour: Cultural and psychological
influences. Organization Studies, 12, 365–386. Landkammer, F., & Sassenberg, K. (2016). Competing while cooperating with the same others: The consequences of conflicting demands in co-opetition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145, 1670–1686. Lau, R. S., & Cobb, A.
T. (2010). Understanding the connections between relationship conflict and performance: The intervening roles of trust and exchange. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 898–917. Lewin, K. (1938). The conceptual representation and the measurement of psychological forces. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Liu,
J., Fu, P., & Liu, S. (2009). Conflicts in top management teams and team/firm outcomes: The moderating effects of conflict-handling approaches. International Journal of Conflict Management, 20, 228–250. Lovelace, K., Shapiro, D. L., & Weingart, L. R. (2001). Maximizing cross-functional new product teams’ innovativeness and constraint
adherence: A conflict communications perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 779–793. Lu, J. F., Tjosvold, D., & Shi, K. (2010). Team training in China: Testing and applying the theory of cooperation and competition. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40, 101–134. McClintock,
C. (1977). Social motives in settings of outcome interdependence. In D. Druckman (Ed.), Negotiations: Social psychological perspective (pp. 49–77). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Maltarich, M. A., Kukenberger, M., Reilly, G., & Mathieu, J. (2018). Conflict in teams: Modeling early and late conflict states and the interactive effects of conflict processes.
Group & Organization Management, 43, 6–37. Mason, R. O., & Mitroff, I. I. (1981). Challenging strategic planning assumptions: Theory, cases, and techniques. New York: Wiley. Mayer, D. M., Aquino, K., Greenbaum, R. L., & Kuenzi, M. (2012). Who displays ethical
leadership, and why does it matter? An examination of antecedents and consequences of ethical leadership. Academy of Management Journal, 55, 151–171. Messick, D. M, & McClintock, C. G. (1968). Motivational bases of choice in experimental games. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 4, 1–25. Mitchell,
R., Nicholas, S., & Boyle, B. (2009). The role of openness to cognitive diversity and group processes in knowledge creation. Small Group Research, 40, 535–554. Mooney, A. C., Holahan, P. J., & Amason, A. C. (2007). Don’t take it personally: Exploring cognitive conflict as a mediator of affective conflict. Journal of Management
Studies, 44, 733–758. Nauta, A., De Dreu, C. K., & Van der Vaart, T. (2002). Social value orientation, organizational goal concerns and interdepartmental problem-solving behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 199–213. Nemeth, C., & Owens, P. (1996). Making
groups more effective: The value of minority dissent. In M. A. West (Ed.), Handbook of work group psychology (pp. 125–141). Chichester, U.K.: Wiley. Ohbuchi, K. I., & Atsumi, E. (2010). Avoidance brings Japanese employees what they care about in conflict management: Its functionality and “good member” image. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 3,
117–129.
Peterson, R. S., & Nemeth, C. J. (1996). Focus versus flexibility majority and minority influence can both improve performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 14–23. Pondy, L. R. (1967). Organizational conflict: Concepts and models. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12, 296–320.
Poon, M., Pike, R., & Tjosvold, D. (2001). Budget participation, goal interdependence and controversy: A study of a Chinese public utility. Management Accounting Research, 12, 101–118. Pruitt, D. G., & Carnevale, P. J. (1993). Negotiation in social conflict. Buckingham, U.K.:
Open University Press. Pruitt, D. G., Carnevale, P. J., Ben-Yoav, O. R. L. Y., Nochajski, T. H., & Van Slyck, M. (1983). Incentives for cooperation in integrative bargaining. Aspiration Levels in Bargaining and Economic Decision Making, 213, 22–34. Pruitt, D. G., &
Lewis, S. A. (1975). Development of integrative solutions in bilateral negotiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 621–633. Pruitt, D. G., & Rubin, J. (1986). Social conflict. New York: Random House. Rahim, M. A. (1983). A measure of styles of handling interpersonal
conflict. Academy of Management Journal, 26, 368–376. Rahim, M. A. (1992). Managing conflict in organizations. 2nd ed. New York: Praeger. Rahim, M. A. (1995). Confirmatory factor analysis of the styles of handling interpersonal conflict: First-order factor model and its invariance across groups. Journal of Applied
Psychology, 80, 122–132. Rahim, A., & Bonoma, T. V. (1979). Managing organizational conflict: A model for diagnosis and intervention. Psychological Reports, 44, 1323–1344. Rispens, S., Greer, L., Jehn, K. A., & Thatcher, S. (2011). Not so bad after all: How
relational closeness buffers the association between relationship conflict and helpful and deviant group behaviors. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 4, 277–296. Salas, E., Rosen, M. A., & DiazGranados, D. (2010). Expertise-based intuition and decision making in organizations. Journal of Management, 36, 941–973. Schei, V., & Rognes, J. K. (2003). Knowing me, knowing you: Own orientation and information about the opponent’s orientation in negotiation. International Journal of Conflict Management, 14, 43–59. Schweiger, D. M., Sandberg, W. R., & Ragan, J. W. (1986). Group approaches for improving strategic
decision making: A comparative analysis of dialectical inquiry, devil’s advocacy, and consensus. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 51–71. Shaw, J. D., Zhu, J., Duffy, M. K., Scott, K. L., Shih, H. A., & Susanto, E. (2011). A contingency model of conflict and team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96,
391–400. Sinkula, J. M., Baker, W. E., & Noordewier, T. (1997). A framework for market-based organizational learning: Linking values, knowledge, and behavior. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25, 305–318. Smith, P. B. (2003). Meeting the challenge of cultural difference. In D.
Tjosvold & K. Leung (Eds.), Cross-cultural foundations: Traditions for managing in a cross-cultural world (pp. 59–71). Farnham, U.K.: Ashgate. Somech, A., Desivilya, H. S., & Lidgoster, H. (2009). Team conflict management and team effectiveness: The effects of task interdependence and team identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior,
30, 359–378. Spector, P. E., & Bruk-Lee, V. (2008). Conflict, health, and well-being. In C. K. W. De Dreu & M. J. Gelfand (Eds.), The psychology of conflict and conflict management in organizations (pp. 267–288). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum. Stogdill, R. M. (1974). Handbook of
leadership: A survey of theory and practice. New York: Free Press. Tekleab, A. G., Quigley, N. R., & Tesluk, P. E. (2009). A longitudinal study of team conflict, conflict management, cohesion, and team effectiveness. Group & Organization Management, 34, 170–205. Tetlock, P. E., Armor,
D., & Peterson, R. S. (1994). The slavery debate in antebellum America: Cognitive style, value conflict, and the limits of compromise. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 115–126. Thiel, C. E., Harvey, J., Courtright, S., & Bradley, B. (2017).
What doesn’t kill you makes you stronger: How teams rebound from early-stage relationship conflict. Journal of Management, 45(4), 1623–1659. Thomas, K. W. (1976). Conflict and conflict management. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational
psychology (pp. 889–935). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally. Thomas, K. W. (1992). Conflict and negotiation processes in organizations. In L. M. Hough & M. D. Dunnette (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, 2nd ed., Vol. 3 (pp. 651–717). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press. Tjosvold,
D. (1984). Effects of crisis orientation on managers’ approach to controversy in decision making. Academy of Management Journal, 27, 130–138. Tjosvold, D. (1985). Implications of controversy research for management. Journal of Management, 11, 19–35. Tjosvold, D. (1988). Effects of shared responsibility and
goal interdependence on controversy and decision making between departments. Journal of Social Psychology, 128, 7–18. Tjosvold, D. (1990a). The goal interdependence approach to communication in conflict: An organizational study. In M. A. Rahim (Ed.), Theory and research in conflict management (pp. 15–27). New York: Praeger. -
Tjosvold, D. (1990b). Flight crew collaboration to manage safety risks. Group and Organization Studies, 15, 177–191. Tjosvold, D. (2002). Managing anger for teamwork in Hong Kong: Goal interdependence and open-mindedness. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 5, 107–123. Tjosvold, D., Cho, Y.
H., Park, H. H., Liu, C., Liu, W. C., & Sasaki, S. (2001). Interdependence and managing conflict with sub-contractors in the construction industry in East Asia. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 18, 295–313. Tjosvold, D., Dann, V., & Wong, C. L. (1992). Managing conflict between departments to serve customers.
Human Relations, 45, 1035–1054. Tjosvold, D., & Halco, J. A. (1992). Performance appraisal of managers: Goal interdependence, ratings, and outcomes. Journal of Social Psychology, 132, 629–639. Tjosvold, D., Hui, C., & Law, K. S. (1998). Empowerment in the
manager–employee relationship in Hong Kong: Interdependence and controversy. Journal of Social Psychology, 138, 624–636. Tjosvold, D., Law, K. S., & Sun, H. (2006). Conflict in Chinese teams: Conflict types and conflict management approaches. Management and Organization Review, 2, 231–252. Tjosvold,
D., & Leung, K. (2003). Cross-cultural management: Foundations and future. Farnham, U.K.: Ashgate. Tjosvold, D., Poon, M., & Yu, Z. Y. (2005). Team effectiveness in China: Cooperative conflict for relationship building. Human Relations, 58, 341–367. Tjosvold, D., &
Su, F. S. (2007). Managing anger and annoyance in organizations in China: The role of constructive controversy. Group & Organization Management, 32, 260–289. Tjosvold, D., & Tjosvold, M. (2015). Teamwork with customers. In Building the team organization (pp. 141–150). London: Palgrave Macmillan. Tjosvold,
D., Wedley, W. C., & Field, R. H. (1986). Constructive controversy, the Vroom-Yetton model, and managerial decision-making. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 7, 125–138. Tjosvold, D., Wong, A. S., & Chen, N. Y. (2014a). Constructively managing conflicts in organizations. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational
Behavior, 1, 545–568. Tjosvold, D., Wong, A. S. H., & Chen, N. Y. F. (2014b). Cooperative and competitive conflict management in organizations. In N. Ashkanasy, K. Jehn, & R. Ayoko (Eds.), Handbook of research in conflict management (pp. 33–50). Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar. Tjosvold, D., Wu, P., & Chen, Y. F. (2010). The effects of collectivistic and individualistic values on conflict and decision making: An experiment in China. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40, 2904–2926. Tjosvold, D., & Yu, Z. (2007). Group risk taking: The constructive role of controversy
in China. Group & Organization Management, 32, 653–674. Todorova, G., Bear, J. B., & Weingart, L. R. (2014). Can conflict be energizing? A study of task conflict, positive emotions, and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99, 451–467. Van de Vliert, E., Euwema,
M. C., & Huismans, S. E. (1995). Managing conflict with a subordinate or a superior: Effectiveness of conglomerated behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 271–281. Van de Vliert, E., & Kabanoff, B. (1990). Toward theory-based measures of conflict management. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 199–209. Van de Vliert, E., Nauta, A., Giebels, E., & Janssen, O. (1999). Constructive conflict at work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 475–491. Van Lange, P. A. (1999). The pursuit of joint outcomes and equality in outcomes: An integrative model of social value orientation. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 337–349. Van Lange, P. A., & Kuhlman, D. M. (1994). Social value orientations and impressions of partner’s honesty and intelligence: a test of the might versus morality effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 126–141. Walton, R. E, &
McKersie, R. B. (1965). A behavioral theory of labor negotiations. New York: McGraw-Hill. Weingart, L. R., Behfar, K. J., Bendersky, C., Todorova, G., & Jehn, K. A. (2015). The directness and oppositional intensity of conflict expression. Academy of Management Review, 40, 235–262. Wong, A. S. H., Liu, Y., & Tjosvold, D. (2015). Service leadership for adaptive selling and effective customer service teams. Industrial Marketing Management, 46, 122–131. Wong, A. S. H., Tjosvold, D., & Yu, Z. Y. (2005). Organizational partnerships in China: Self-interest, goal
interdependence, and opportunism. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 782–791. Wong, A. S. H., Wei, L., & Tjosvold, D. (2014). Business and regulators partnerships: Government transformational leadership for constructive conflict management. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 31, 497–522. Wong,
A., Wei, L., Yang, J., & Tjosvold, D. (2017). Productivity and participation values for cooperative goals to limit free riding and promote performance in international joint ventures. Journal of World Business, 52, 819–830. Wong, A., Yang, J., & Tjosvold, D. (2018). Ethical leaders manage conflict to develop trust.
Manuscript, Lingnan University, Hong Kong. Wong, E. M., Ormiston, M. E., & Tetlock, P. E. (2011). The effects of top management team integrative complexity and decentralized decision making on corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 1207–1228. Xu, J., & Thomas, H.
C. (2011). How can leaders achieve high employee engagement? Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 32, 339–416. Zhang, X. A., Cao, Q., & Tjosvold, D. (2011). Linking transformational leadership and team performance: A conflict management approach. Journal of Management Studies, 48, 1586–1611.
What is the most constructive type of conflict?
The most constructive type of conflict is affective conflict. Cognitive conflict is differences in perspectives or judgments about issues. The most fundamental unit of value in the creativity revolution is ideas.
A manager could also promote constructive conflict by holding diversity training and events. Also, celebrating cultural differences of each team member will also promote constructive conflict. Specifically, managers roles in employee reviews is key in promoting constructive conflict.
How does constructive disagreement improve group decision making?
Constructive conflict is precisely what pushes groups to become more than the sum of their individual members. In this sense, opposing ideas influence, complement, provoke and inform one another. And in the best of scenarios, the final decision is better because of it.
What is a great group decision making strategy?
Collect opinions independently.
To get the most out of your team's diverse capabilities, we recommend gathering opinions individually before people share their thoughts within the wider group. You can ask team members to record their ideas independently and anonymously in a shared document, for example.
|
