Duy trì hiệu suất hoàn hảo ở khẩu độ tối đa lên đến F/ 2.8L nhưng ở trong một kích thước nhỏ hơn, ống kính Canon EF 70-200mm F/4L IS USM là một ống kính tele thích hợp để chụp từ thể thao đến chân dung một cách hoàn hảo. Nó hoàn toàn tương thích với Extender EF 1.4x II và teleconverters 2x II và hệ thống ổn định hình ảnh quang học IS giảm mờ ảnh do rung máy. Với hệ thống ổn định hình ảnh IS cung cấp lên đến 4 bước dừng giúp tối ưu hóa cho các chủ đề chuyển động nhanh. Đây là ống kính thuộc dòng cao cấp "L" series của Canon được thiết kế dành cho các nhiếp ảnh gia chuyên nghiệp với khả năng duy trì khẩu độ mở cố định và chất lượng hình ảnh không đổi trong suốt dải tiêu cự từ 70mm đến 200mm. Do đó cho phép bạn đặt khẩu độ mở lớn tối đa ở mọi tiêu cự cho tới 200mm và duy trì tốc độ cửa chập ổn định khi chụp chủ thể gần cũng như ở xa. Ống kính Canon EF 70-200mm F/4L IS USM sở hữu có chế căn nét tự động tuyệt vời, cực nhanh và rất êm, nhờ vòng USM siêu âm. Vòng chuyển cơ chế cắn nét tự động sáng bằng tay giúp các bạn có thể chuyển sang chế độ MF bất cứ lúc nào mà không cần điểu chỉnh máy chuyển chế độ trước đó. Đây là ống kính được các nhiếp ảnh gia chuyên nghiệp đánh giá cho chất lượng hình ảnh rõ nét trong toàn bộ khung hình nhờ các thấu kính chống tán xạ chất lượng cao. Các lớp phủ bề mặt ống kính giúp giảm thiểu hiện tượng lóa sáng và hiện tượng bóng ma vì vậy mang lại hình ảnh rõ nét, không méo hình và màu sắc tự nhiên trung thực. TÍNH NĂNG NỔI BẬT - Là ống kính zoom tele với khẩu độ tối đa F/4 - Gồm 2 chế độ ổn định quang học lên đến 4 điểm dừng giúp chống mờ ảnh do máy bị rung. Khi chụp các đối tượng không chuyển động ở chế độ 1 (mode 1) hệ thống thấu kính được tự động vi chỉnh theo cả trục ngang lẫn trục dọc. Khi chụp lia máy theo chiều ngang, chế độ 2 (mode 2) – chụp lia máy (panning mode) – sẽ tự động tắt hệ thống vi chỉnh theo trục dọc nhằm bảo đảm chất lượng hình ảnh. Cơ chế chống rung IS sẽ tự động tắt khi đặt máy lên chân máy để chống xung đột giữa cảm biến IS với các rung động của mô-tơ gắn bên trong. - Động cơ lấy nét siêu âm USM cung cấp khả năng lấy nét nhanh chóng và êm ái - Sử dụng 1 thấu kính Flourite và 2 thấu kính UD giúp kiếm soát quang sai - Khả năng chống ẩm và chống bụi hoàn hảo - Lá khẩu tròn cho hình ảnh mờ tự nhiên - Thiết kế nhỏ gọn và nhẹ hơn so với Canon 70-200 F/2.8 - Sử dụng Filter 67mm, tương thích với A-II(W) tripod collar and the 1.4x II and 2.0x II extenders Ống kính Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM là ống kính cao cấp của Canon được dùng để chụp chân dung, ảnh cưới, thể thao, sản phẩm và động vật của dân chuyên nghiệp, dịch vụ ảnh hay người có đam mê và có tài chính. Nếu bạn chỉ quen dùng lens thường thì chắc chắn khi chuyển sang lens này bạn sẽ vô cùng ngạc nhiên bởi chất lượng ảnh được cải thiện đáng kể. I see a big difference in sharpness but I feel the color and the contrast of the older version Was slightly better.Am I right or wrong? Anybody has the same experience? Canon EOS 80D Canon EF 70-200mm F4L IS USM Canon EF-S 10-18mm F4.5–5.6 IS STM ANSWER: This question has not been answered yet. (unknown member) • Regular Member • Posts: 321 Re: Canon 70-200 L f4 non IS Vs Canon 70_200L f4 IS In reply to Alinader • Nov 23, 2017 4 wow the NON IS is fantastik. Just had to put in my 2 cents. I din't think they could make a sharper lens. The color and contrast are very impressive. ed rader • Veteran Member • Posts: 9,074 not my experince at all............ In reply to Alinader • Nov 23, 2017 and you are the first person ever to have said that. did you read any reviews? Canon EOS 80D Canon EOS 5D Mark IV Sigma 15mm F2.8 EX DG Diagonal Fisheye Canon EF 24-70mm F2.8L II USM Canon EF 16-35mm F4L IS USM +4 more Re: Canon 70-200 L f4 non IS Vs Canon 70_200L f4 IS In reply to Alinader • Nov 23, 2017 1 I've had both and the IS version seems to be better in every way especially the extra 3-4 stops. This is one of my favorite lenses Here is review of the lens comparing it to non IS version https://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Canon-EF-70-200mm-f-4.0-L-IS-USM-Lens-Review.aspx Canon EOS 70D Canon EOS 7D Mark II Canon EOS 5D Mark IV Canon EF 50mm F1.4 USM Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM +9 more Re: Canon 70-200 L f4 non IS Vs Canon 70_200L f4 IS In reply to Alinader • Nov 23, 2017 No. -- hide signature -- \>> I'm already lovin' my Canon 35IS lens! << Canon EF 100mm F2.8L Macro IS USM Canon EF 70-200mm F2.8L IS II USM Canon EF 70-200mm F4L IS USM Canon EF 24-70mm F2.8L II USM Canon EF 40mm f/2.8 STM +5 more  OP Alinader • Forum Member • Posts: 79 Re: Canon 70-200 L f4 non IS Vs Canon 70_200L f4 IS Have you tried the IS version? Canon EOS 80D Canon EF 70-200mm F4L IS USM Canon EF-S 10-18mm F4.5–5.6 IS STM KenMT • Regular Member • Posts: 195 Re: Canon 70-200 L f4 non IS Vs Canon 70_200L f4 IS I see that you have both the 2.8 and 4.0 IS versions of the 70-200. Which do you use the most? Canon EOS 7D Mark II Canon EOS 5D Mark IV Canon EF 100mm F2.8L Macro IS USM Canon MP-E 65mm f/2.5 1-5x Macro Sigma 12-24mm F4.5-5.6 EX DG Aspherical HSM +7 more Re: Canon 70-200 L f4 non IS Vs Canon 70_200L f4 IS In reply to KenMT • Nov 24, 2017 KenMT wrote: I see that you have both the 2.8 and 4.0 IS versions of the 70-200. Which do you use the most? I indeed own both the f/4LIS and the f/2.8LISII, and i use them both equally, but this is only because i make a deliberate effort to use the latter, not out of need, but out of remorse for having it bought it, and not using it. GAS remorse. -- hide signature -- \>> I'm already lovin' my Canon 35IS lens! << Canon EF 100mm F2.8L Macro IS USM Canon EF 70-200mm F2.8L IS II USM Canon EF 70-200mm F4L IS USM Canon EF 24-70mm F2.8L II USM Canon EF 40mm f/2.8 STM +5 more (unknown member) • Regular Member • Posts: 321 Re: Canon 70-200 L f4 non IS Vs Canon 70_200L f4 IS In reply to Alinader • Nov 24, 2017 1 I picked up the 70-200 non IS used for a very low price. I shot some sports and did a family photo session with the lens and I was very impressed. I have since read reviews and forum responses to almost all the L lens. I know there are a large number of exceptional lenses available. And someday I would like the f2.8 IS Vii lens but since this lens is awesome I will wait until i have the 100-400 and the 16-35 f4. I'm not saying the 70-200 f4 Non IS lens is the best version or sharper then the other versions of the 70-200. Just that it is awesome and also the least expensive version. I shoot it on a $50 monopod and no issues with camera shake for sports outdoors. HarryLally • Senior Member • Posts: 2,716 Re: Canon 70-200 L f4 non IS Vs Canon 70_200L f4 IS In reply to Alinader • Nov 24, 2017 2 I still have both lenses and have tested them against each other (tripod, MLU etc) on the 6D. They're equally sharp from 70 to140mm or so, then the IS version starts to pull away and is noticeably sharper at 200mm. However, the IS version has very slightly more contrast and is almost 'grittier'. I marginally prefer the colours of the non-IS version, which are slightly warmer and 'creamier'. However, the superb IS ln the newer version makes it the winner, for me. OP Alinader • Forum Member • Posts: 79 Re: Canon 70-200 L f4 non IS Vs Canon 70_200L f4 IS 2 HarryLally wrote: I still have both lenses and have tested them against each other (tripod, MLU etc) on the 6D. They're equally sharp from 70 to140mm or so, then the IS version starts to pull away and is noticeably sharper at 200mm. However, the IS version has very slightly more contrast and is almost 'grittier'. I marginally prefer the colours of the non-IS version, which are slightly warmer and 'creamier'. However, the superb IS ln the newer version makes it the winner, for me. I agree with You ,the IS version is sharper but non IS colors are more pleasant! Canon EOS 80D Canon EF 70-200mm F4L IS USM Canon EF-S 10-18mm F4.5–5.6 IS STM 2Risky • Forum Member • Posts: 60 Re: Canon 70-200 L f4 non IS Vs Canon 70_200L f4 IS In reply to Alinader • Nov 27, 2017 1 I don't recall there being any difference between the two lenses although admittedly the ownership wasn't concurrent. I do remember wondering why I upgraded to IS. I guess I thought I would be using it in some low light shoots. Instead I got the f 2.8 ii, which is definitely impressive but a beast to carry around, which is why I still have the f 4 version. Under the right conditions both are capable of some very impressive output but the f 4 can't separate the subject from the background like the f 2.8 can. Canon EOS 6D Canon EF 70-200mm F2.8L IS II USM Canon EF 24-70mm F2.8L II USM Sigma 50mm F1.4 DG HSM | A Canon 85mm F1.4L IS USM +6 more BlueRay2 • Forum Pro • Posts: 14,816 Re: Canon 70-200 L f4 non IS Vs Canon 70_200L f4 IS In reply to 2Risky • Dec 4, 2017 1 2Risky wrote: i disagree with that statement, please post your best shot with f2.8 II and lets compare, here is why and look at isolation and bokeh: DuckShots • Contributing Member • Posts: 756 Re: Canon 70-200 L f4 non IS Vs Canon 70_200L f4 IS In reply to Alinader • Dec 5, 2017 2 yes Canon G5 X II Canon EOS R6 Canon EOS R6 Mark II Canon RF 50mm F1.2L USM Canon RF 35mm F1.8 IS STM Macro +3 more Paul JM • Contributing Member • Posts: 632 Re: Canon 70-200 L f4 non IS Vs Canon 70_200L f4 IS In reply to Alinader • Dec 6, 2017 1 The non IS version is very sharp and it is hard to understand why you would feel a great difference in sharpness with the IS lens on, presumably, your 80D with a 24 MP crop sensor. Either lens should be more than adequate on that body. Differences really relate to price, weight, and the IS feature. I have the original non IS f4, have had it for about 12 years, and it is perfectly crisp on a 5DSR Canon EOS R5 Fujifilm X-H2 Canon EF 15mm f/2.8 Fisheye Canon EF 85mm F1.8 USM Canon EF 17-40mm f/4.0L USM +11 more OP Alinader • Forum Member • Posts: 79 Re: Canon 70-200 L f4 non IS Vs Canon 70_200L f4 IS In reply to Paul JM • Dec 11, 2017 You are right I shouldn't say a big difference in sharpness but based on my experience and the DIGITAL PICTURE website the IS version is sharper. Canon EOS 80D Canon EF 70-200mm F4L IS USM Canon EF-S 10-18mm F4.5–5.6 IS STM KWEnz • Regular Member • Posts: 459 Re: Canon 70-200 L f4 non IS Vs Canon 70_200L f4 IS In reply to BlueRay2 • Dec 12, 2017 1Dx4me wrote:2Risky wrote: Even with the 1.4x TC attached the f4.0 IS gives a nice out of focus background: Canon EOS 7D Mark II Canon EF-S 10-22mm F3.5-4.5 USM Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM Canon Extender EF 1.4x II Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM +5 more Keyboard shortcuts: FForum MMy threads Latest sample galleriesLatest in-depth reviewsThe LowePro PhotoSport Outdoor is a camera pack for photographers who also need a well-designed daypack for hiking and other outdoor use. If that sounds like you, the PhotoSport Outdoor may be a great choice, but as with any hybrid product, there are a few tradeoffs. The Sony a7C II refreshes the compact full-frame with a 33MP sensor, the addition of a front control dial, a dedicated 'AI' processor, 10-bit 4K/60p video and more. It's a definite improvement, but it helps if you value its compact form. Why is the Peak Design Everyday Backpack so widely used? A snazzy design? Exceptional utility? A combination of both? After testing one, it's clear why this bag deserves every accolade it's received. The new Wacom One 12 pen display, now in its second generation, offers photographers an affordable option to the mouse or trackpad, making processing images easy and efficient by editing directly on the screen. For photographers who need advanced photo editing options, Pixelmator Pro for macOS offers layer-based editing, machine learning-powered adjustment and selection tools, and features such as Denoise and Super Resolution. It's also affordable. Latest buying guides'What's the best mirrorless camera?' We're glad you asked. What’s the best camera for around $2000? This price point gives you access to some of the most all-round capable cameras available. Excellent image quality, powerful autofocus and great looking video are the least you can expect. We've picked the models that really stand out. Above $2500 cameras tend to become increasingly specialized, making it difficult to select a 'best' option. We case our eye over the options costing more than $2500 but less than $4000, to find the best all-rounder. What’s the best camera for around $1500? These midrange cameras should have capable autofocus systems, lots of direct controls and the latest sensors offering great image quality. We recommend our favorite options. Around $1000 is increasingly becoming the entry point for modern interchangeable lens cameras. We look at what you can get for your money, and which we think is best. |
